There’s no shortage of talk about working capital optimisation, but here’s the part that’s often glossed over: the actual cost of waiting to get paid. For suppliers, late payments don’t just tighten margins – they disrupt operations, trigger unnecessary borrowing, and cap growth before it even has a chance to compound.
And the numbers speak for themselves. Across Europe, nearly 1 in 2 invoices are paid late. It’s a chronic pattern that doesn’t just slow down suppliers but it slowly forces them into survival mode.
The Trade-Offs Suppliers Are Forced to Make
When payments stall, choices become narrower and riskier. Let’s start with staffing. A supplier running on thin cash flow can’t afford to keep skilled labor idle while waiting for invoices to clear. So they either reduce headcount or push current teams beyond capacity – both of which hit output and reliability. From a buyer’s perspective, that can eventually boomerang in the form of missed deadlines or quality slippage.
Then there’s procurement. Suppliers may delay or reduce purchases of raw materials because they don’t have immediate funds. This leads to smaller production batches or missed contract opportunities. Growth plans are shelved, not because there’s no demand, but because liquidity can’t match ambition.
It’s not that the business model is broken. It’s that payment terms and cash cycles are operating in two different time zones.
Debt as a Last – but Frequent – Resort
When faced with this recurring squeeze, many suppliers turn to external financing. But that’s rarely a clean solution. The borrowing costs to bridge cash flow gaps can range from inconvenient to outright painful – especially when the credit is short-term, interest rates are aggressive, or repayment is tied to the very receivables that are delayed in the first place.
These costs don’t show up on a balance sheet as clearly as a bad investment, but over time they have the same effect: eroding the financial flexibility suppliers need to evolve and compete. And they’re not always visible to buyers, who may assume that suppliers can “manage” delays the same way a well-capitalised corporation might. That’s a flawed assumption.
What Happens When That Stress Compounds?
Inconsistent cash flow causes a ripple effect that goes beyond suppliers. When they operate in a defensive financial stance, buyers are impacted too. Orders get pushed, flexibility shrinks, and the quality of the relationship deteriorates. And in highly regulated sectors like food, pharma, and automotive, the room for error is minimal.
In an environment where suppliers are increasingly critical to resilience and innovation, buyers can’t afford to ignore the long-term risk of undercapitalised partners. And yet, many continue to operate with rigid payment terms that serve treasury goals but distort the health of the supply chain.
This disconnect needs fixing. But not through goodwill or another round of negotiations—through infrastructure.
Do you find this article interesting?
Subscribe to our Newsletter for updates on the latest blog articles.
Early Payment Without Asking Twice
Suppliers shouldn’t have to wait 60 to 90 days to get paid, and they shouldn’t have to call, chase, or renegotiate every time cash flow tightens. That’s where Liquiditas steps in.
Instead of inserting more friction or overhead, Liquiditas enables early payments to suppliers without requiring the buyer to change existing terms. The model works by giving suppliers access to funding the moment an invoice is approved. No waiting. No awkward asks. No damaging leverage shifts.
This is not factoring. It’s not dynamic discounting. And it’s not a blunt tool that treats every supplier the same. It’s a digital platform that works in the background – fast, secure, and purpose-built for large enterprises with complex supplier networks.
The buyer maintains control. The supplier gets liquidity. And the cash doesn’t come out of the buyer’s pocket – it’s backed by secured financial resources that don’t interfere with budget planning or payment cycles.
Why This Matters to CFOs
If you’re leading finance at a company with very high revenue run rates, you’re not just managing cash – you’re managing risk, relationships, and reputation. Delayed payments may feel like an optimisation lever in the short term, but in a high-volume supply chain, it quickly becomes a liability.
Suppliers that are under pressure to borrow are more likely to break down under stress. And that’s not just anecdotal. Study after study shows that supplier distress is a top-five driver of operational disruption across global industries. Procurement can only do so much. Finance needs to step in with systems that don’t just measure cash – but improve how it moves.
Liquiditas gives you that control. It allows you to support your supply chain without destabilising your own liquidity profile. It removes the dependency on one-size-fits-all financing programs. And most importantly, it provides a practical alternative to the endless negotiation loop that characterises so many buyer-supplier dynamics.
Don’t Let Liquidity Be the Weakest Link
Delaying payments has always had a cost. That cost used to be invisible. Today, it’s measurable, material, and avoidable. The question is whether you’re willing to keep absorbing that risk or if you’d rather shift to a model that protects your business without compromising your financial goals.
Liquidity isn’t just a supplier problem – it’s a supply chain risk. And like any risk, it can be addressed through the right architecture.
